実証政治学ワークショップのご案内（Workshop Announcement: April 30, 13:10-）

実証政治学ワークショップのご案内（Workshop Announcement: April 30, 13:10-） 

Lingnan UniversityのPlamen Akaliyski氏をお迎えし、 “Individualism–Collectivism: Reconstructing Hofstede’s Dimension of Cultural Differences”と題してワークショップを開催します。どなたでもご参加いただけます。事前登録は不要です。ぜひご参加下さい。
We are very pleased to host Prof. Plamen Akaliyski (Lingnan University) for a special talk with the title “Individualism–Collectivism: Reconstructing Hofstede’s Dimension of Cultural Differences”.  Pre-registration is not required. We look forward to your participation.

日時：2026年4月30日（木）13:10–14:50
Date and Time: Thursday, April 30, 2026, 13:10–14:50

場所：11号館1105
Venue：Room 1105, Building 11, Waseda Campus, Waseda University

言語Language：英語English

要旨Abstract：
Individualism–collectivism (I-C), the most widely researched cultural dimension, is often equated with Hofstede’s pioneering nation scores. Concerns are growing about these scores’ validity, but subsequent research has not produced a widely accepted alternative. Here, we offer a refined theoretical conceptualization of I-C, we systematically reevaluate the validity of Hofstede’s I-C scores, and we report the development and validation of a new I-C index, covering 102 countries/territories inhabited by an estimated 88% of the world’s population. In Study 1, we document the inferior convergent and nomological validity of Hofstede’s I-C index, compared to subsequent measures. Hofstede’s scores substantially overestimate individualism in English-speaking countries and collectivism in East Asian societies, which we demonstrate can considerably bias research findings. In Study 2, we develop an authoritative, theory-driven I-C index, using nationally representative data from the World Values Survey and European Values Study, which shows excellent internal coherence, temporal stability, and strong evidence of convergent, discriminant, and nomological validity. Theorized facets of individualism—freedom (vs. conformity), tolerance of differences (vs. exclusion), and equality (vs. discrimination)—form a coherent and stable dimension at the cultural level of analysis. Individualism is higher in societies with better existential security (e.g., socioeconomic development, stable institutions) and is not associated with greater selfishness, anomie, or competitive beliefs and values. Relying on outdated indices may perpetuate cultural stereotypes and underpin flawed theorizing. Scholars should use theoretically appropriate and up-to-date measures of societal culture when seeking to understand global variation in human psychological functioning.

BIO：
Plamen Akaliyski (PhD, University of Oslo) is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Sociology and Social Policy at Lingnan University, Hong Kong. His research focuses on global cultural value differences and change, examining factors such as historical legacies, environmental adaptations, and modernization processes. He has published more than 30 academic articles, including in leading journals such as Journal of International Business Studies, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, World Development, European Journal of Political Research, and Social Science & Medicine.

Contact： 小林哲郎（早稲田大学） Tetsuro Kobayashi (Waseda University)  [email protected]