{"id":74969,"date":"2023-08-08T10:27:19","date_gmt":"2023-08-08T01:27:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.waseda.jp\/inst\/research\/?p=74969"},"modified":"2023-08-08T10:27:19","modified_gmt":"2023-08-08T01:27:19","slug":"the-impossibility-ofdeliberation-consistent-social-choice%ef%bc%88published-in-american-journal-of-political-science-may-2023%ef%bc%89-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.waseda.jp\/inst\/research\/news\/74969","title":{"rendered":"(The Impossibility of)Deliberation-Consistent Social Choice\uff08Published in American journal of Political Science, May 2023\uff09"},"content":{"rendered":"<table class=\"table table-bordered table-colored-tbhd\" style=\"height: 550px; width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse; border-style: solid;\" border=\"1\">\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 78px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 16.7893%; height: 78px;\">Journal Title<br \/>\n\/\u63b2\u8f09\u30b8\u30e3\u30fc\u30ca\u30eb\u540d<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 71.3712%; height: 78px;\">American journal of Political Science<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 65px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 16.7893%; height: 80px;\">Publication Year and Month<br \/>\n\/\u63b2\u8f09\u5e74\u6708<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 71.3712%; height: 80px;\">May, 2023<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 55px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 16.7893%; height: 79px;\">Paper Title<br \/>\n\/\u8ad6\u6587\u30bf\u30a4\u30c8\u30eb<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 71.3712%; height: 79px;\">(The Impossibility of)Deliberation-Consistent Social Choice<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 85px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 16.7893%; height: 85px;\">DOI<br \/>\n\/\u8ad6\u6587DOI<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 71.3712%; height: 85px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ajps.12792\">10.1111\/ajps.12792<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 59px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 16.7893%; height: 80px;\">\u00a0Author of Waseda University<br \/>\n\/\u672c\u5b66\u306e\u8457\u8005<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 71.3712%; height: 80px;\">ADACHI, Tsuyoshi(Associate Professor, Faculty of Political Science and Economics, School of Political Science and Economics):First Author<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 68px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 16.7893%; height: 86px;\">Related Websites<br \/>\n\/\u95a2\u9023Web<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 71.3712%; height: 86px;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 138px;\">\n<td style=\"width: 16.7893%; height: 148px;\">Abstract<br \/>\n\/\u6284\u9332<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 71.3712%; height: 148px;\">There is now a growing consensus among democratic theorists that we should incorporate both \u201cdemocratic deliberation\u201d and \u201caggregative voting\u201d into our democratic processes. But how should the two democratic mechanisms of deliberation and voting interact? In this article,\u00a0we introduce a new axiom, which we call \u201cNonnegative Response toward Successful Deliberation\u201d (NNRD). The basic idea is that if some individuals change their preferences toward other individuals\u2019 preferences through democratic deliberation, then the social choice rule should not make everybody who has successfully persuaded others through reasoned deliberation worse off than what they would have achieved without deliberation. We prove an impossibility theorem that shows that there exists no aggregation rule that can simultaneously satisfy NNRD along with other mild axioms that reflect deliberative democracy&#8217;s core commitment to unanimous consensus and political equality. We offer potential escape routes; however, each escape route can succeed only by compromising some core value of deliberative democracy.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Journal Title \/\u63b2\u8f09\u30b8\u30e3\u30fc\u30ca\u30eb\u540d American journal of Political Science Publication Year and Month \/\u63b2\u8f09\u5e74\u6708 May, 2023 Paper [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[218,217],"class_list":["post-74969","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-impact-en","tag-impact"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.waseda.jp\/inst\/research\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74969","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.waseda.jp\/inst\/research\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.waseda.jp\/inst\/research\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.waseda.jp\/inst\/research\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.waseda.jp\/inst\/research\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74969"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.waseda.jp\/inst\/research\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74969\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":74970,"href":"https:\/\/www.waseda.jp\/inst\/research\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74969\/revisions\/74970"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.waseda.jp\/inst\/research\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74969"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.waseda.jp\/inst\/research\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74969"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.waseda.jp\/inst\/research\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74969"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}