ͽÄêɽ -¾ÜºÙ¾ðÊó-
·ï̾ | WS ÅÄÃæÃÎÈþ»á |
³«»ÏÆü»þ | 2011ǯ 12·î 15Æü (ÌÚÍËÆü) 16»þ40ʬ (GMT+09:00) |
½ªÎ»Æü»þ | 2011ǯ 12·î 15Æü (ÌÚÍËÆü) 18»þ00ʬ (GMT+09:00) |
¾ì½ê | 1¹æ´Û401¶µ¼¼ |
¾ÜºÙ | ¡ÚÊó¹ð¼Ô¡Û¡§ÅÄÃæÃÎÈþ»á¡Ê¥¢¥ê¥¾¥Ê½£Î©Âç³Ø½Ú¶µ¼ø¡Ë ¡Ú¥¿¥¤¥È¥ë¡Û¡§¡ÉDoes Marriage Work as a Savings Commitment Device? : Experimental Evidence from Vietnam¡É ¡Ú¾ì½ê¡Û1¹æ´Û401¶µ¼¼ ¡¡ ¡Ú³µÍסۡ§ We conducted a time discounting experiment with married couples, and examined how time preferences, particularly time inconsistency, affect intrahousehold financial decision making. Our experimental results suggest people are more patient when they make decisions jointly with their spouses. The analysis of survey data shows time-inconsistent individuals turn over smaller percentages of their earnings to their spouses. Time-inconsistent husbands are more likely to keep cash within households compared with time-consistent husbands. Time-inconsistent individuals are given smaller amounts of allowances, but they tend to conceal money to compensate. In addition, time-inconsistent subjects choose not to ask their spouses to keep their experimental earnings and save it for them in the experiment. This study shows marriage does not function (or may counteract) as a savings commitment device, especially for time-inconsistent individuals. This implies households need external savings commitment devices such as ROSCAs to protect money from spouses who have hyperbolic preferences. |
¥«¥Æ¥´¥ê¡¼ | ¥ï¡¼¥¯¥·¥ç¥Ã¥×¡¦¥»¥ß¥Ê¡¼ |