À©ÅÙ¹½ÃÛ¤ÎÀ¯¼£·ÐºÑ³Ø¡Ý´üÂԼ¸½¼Ò²ñ¤Ë¸þ¤±¤Æ¡Ý
English
GLOPEII¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ News ¥¤¥Ù¥ó¥È¥¹¥±¥¸¥å¡¼¥ë ¥ï¡¼¥­¥ó¥°¥Ú¡¼¥Ñ¡¼ GLOPE II À¤ÏÀÄ´ºº°ìÍ÷ ¥ê¥ó¥¯

ͽÄêɽ -¾ÜºÙ¾ðÊó-

·ï̾ LS ¹â¶¶Ä¾¹À»á
³«»ÏÆü»þ 2011ǯ 10·î 4Æü (²ÐÍËÆü)   12»þ15ʬ (GMT+09:00)
½ªÎ»Æü»þ 2011ǯ 10·î 4Æü (²ÐÍËÆü)   12»þ50ʬ (GMT+09:00)
¾ì½ê 1¹æ´Û401¶µ¼¼
¾ÜºÙ ¡ÚÆü»þ¡Û¡§10·î4Æü¡Ê²Ð¡Ë 12:15¡Á12:50
¡Ú¾ì½ê¡Û¡§1¹æ´Û401¶µ¼¼
¡ÚÊó¹ð¼Ô¡Û¡§¹â¶¶Ä¾¹À»á¡ÊÁá°ðÅÄÂç³Ø·ÐºÑ³Ø¸¦µæ²Ê¡Ë
¡ÚÊó¹ð¥¿¥¤¥È¥ë¡Û¡§"Risk perception and consumer behavior toward BSE"

¡Ú³µÍסÛ
The primary purpose of my discussion is to identify the impact on beef
consumption in Japan of the announcements of ¡Èthe first cases of BSE¡É
in Japan and the U.S. and those of ¡Èthe safety secured¡É for these
cases. The empirical analysis shows that the announcement of ¡Èthe
safety secured for domestic beef¡É seems to have helped restore the
confidence in domestic beef, while that of ¡Èthe safety secured for
U.S. beef¡É does not appear to have had a significant impact on
consumers¡Ç risk perception of U.S. beef. Given the findings, I also
try to explain, using the game theory and assuming ¡Èemotional¡É
consumers, why they responded to the two announcements in different
manners. I conclude that the announcement of ¡Èthe safety secured for
domestic beef¡É, in which the effect of testing all cattle on the
safety was exaggerated, might have given consumers the bias for their
perceived risk, leading them to behave in a different way toward the
next announcement for U.S. beef.
¢¨ This talk will be given by English.
¥«¥Æ¥´¥ê¡¼ À¯¼£·ÐºÑ³Ø´ðÁÃ¥»¥ß¥Ê¡¼¡¦¥é¥ó¥Á¥¿¥¤¥à¥»¥ß¥Ê¡¼
¥µ¥¤¥È¥Þ¥Ã¥×
Home¤Ø