ͽÄêɽ -¾ÜºÙ¾ðÊó-
·ï̾ | LS ¹â¶¶Ä¾¹À»á |
³«»ÏÆü»þ | 2011ǯ 10·î 4Æü (²ÐÍËÆü) 12»þ15ʬ (GMT+09:00) |
½ªÎ»Æü»þ | 2011ǯ 10·î 4Æü (²ÐÍËÆü) 12»þ50ʬ (GMT+09:00) |
¾ì½ê | 1¹æ´Û401¶µ¼¼ |
¾ÜºÙ | ¡ÚÆü»þ¡Û¡§10·î4Æü¡Ê²Ð¡Ë 12:15¡Á12:50 ¡Ú¾ì½ê¡Û¡§1¹æ´Û401¶µ¼¼ ¡ÚÊó¹ð¼Ô¡Û¡§¹â¶¶Ä¾¹À»á¡ÊÁá°ðÅÄÂç³Ø·ÐºÑ³Ø¸¦µæ²Ê¡Ë ¡ÚÊó¹ð¥¿¥¤¥È¥ë¡Û¡§"Risk perception and consumer behavior toward BSE" ¡Ú³µÍ×¡Û The primary purpose of my discussion is to identify the impact on beef consumption in Japan of the announcements of ¡Èthe first cases of BSE¡É in Japan and the U.S. and those of ¡Èthe safety secured¡É for these cases. The empirical analysis shows that the announcement of ¡Èthe safety secured for domestic beef¡É seems to have helped restore the confidence in domestic beef, while that of ¡Èthe safety secured for U.S. beef¡É does not appear to have had a significant impact on consumers¡Ç risk perception of U.S. beef. Given the findings, I also try to explain, using the game theory and assuming ¡Èemotional¡É consumers, why they responded to the two announcements in different manners. I conclude that the announcement of ¡Èthe safety secured for domestic beef¡É, in which the effect of testing all cattle on the safety was exaggerated, might have given consumers the bias for their perceived risk, leading them to behave in a different way toward the next announcement for U.S. beef. ¢¨ This talk will be given by English. |
¥«¥Æ¥´¥ê¡¼ | À¯¼£·ÐºÑ³Ø´ðÁÃ¥»¥ß¥Ê¡¼¡¦¥é¥ó¥Á¥¿¥¤¥à¥»¥ß¥Ê¡¼ |