À©ÅÙ¹½ÃÛ¤ÎÀ¯¼£·ÐºÑ³Ø¡Ý´üÂԼ¸½¼Ò²ñ¤Ë¸þ¤±¤Æ¡Ý
English
GLOPEII¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ News ¥¤¥Ù¥ó¥È¥¹¥±¥¸¥å¡¼¥ë ¥ï¡¼¥­¥ó¥°¥Ú¡¼¥Ñ¡¼ GLOPE II À¤ÏÀÄ´ºº°ìÍ÷ ¥ê¥ó¥¯

ͽÄêɽ -¾ÜºÙ¾ðÊó-

·ï̾ LS Luigi Curini»á
³«»ÏÆü»þ 2010ǯ 11·î 16Æü (²ÐÍËÆü)   12»þ15ʬ (GMT+09:00)
½ªÎ»Æü»þ 2010ǯ 11·î 16Æü (²ÐÍËÆü)   12»þ50ʬ (GMT+09:00)
¾ì½ê 1¹æ´Û310¶µ¼¼
¾ÜºÙ GLOPE II ¥é¥ó¥Á¥¿¥¤¥à¥»¥ß¥Ê¡¼
¡ÚÆü»þ¡Û¡§2010ǯ11·î16Æü¡Ê²Ð¡Ë12:15-12:50
¡Ú¾ì½ê¡Û¡§1¹æ´Û 310¶µ¼¼

¡ÚÊó¹ð¼Ô¡Û¡§Luigi CURINI»á (Universit½æA degli Studi di Milano)
¡Ú¥¿¥¤¥È¥ë¡Û¡§"Satisfaction with Democracy and the Winner-Loser Debate: the role of policy preferences and past experience"
¡Ú³µÍסۡ§
Previous studies have examined the gap between electoral winners and losers on various dimensions of political support finding that winners express significantly greater support than losers at each level. These works however define winners and losers in a static fashion by examining their attitudes at a single time point, and employ a dichotomous categorization that neglects possible variations within each group. In this study we take into consideration both the past history of winning or losing on present attitudes, and the impact of ideological distance from the government on satisfaction with democracy. By analyzing surveys covering 31 countries, we show that the relationship between winner/loser status and satisfaction with democracy contains both a marginal dynamic nature as well as policy content. The substantial implications of these findings are finally addressed.


¥«¥Æ¥´¥ê¡¼ À¯¼£·ÐºÑ³Ø´ðÁÃ¥»¥ß¥Ê¡¼¡¦¥é¥ó¥Á¥¿¥¤¥à¥»¥ß¥Ê¡¼
¥µ¥¤¥È¥Þ¥Ã¥×
Home¤Ø