À©ÅÙ¹½ÃÛ¤ÎÀ¯¼£·ÐºÑ³Ø¡Ý´üÂԼ¸½¼Ò²ñ¤Ë¸þ¤±¤Æ¡Ý
English
GLOPEII¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ News ¥¤¥Ù¥ó¥È¥¹¥±¥¸¥å¡¼¥ë ¥ï¡¼¥­¥ó¥°¥Ú¡¼¥Ñ¡¼ GLOPE II À¤ÏÀÄ´ºº°ìÍ÷ ¥ê¥ó¥¯

ͽÄêɽ -¾ÜºÙ¾ðÊó-

·ï̾ LS ÈøºêÆØ»Ê»á
³«»ÏÆü»þ 2009ǯ 12·î 22Æü (²ÐÍËÆü)   12»þ15ʬ (GMT+09:00)
½ªÎ»Æü»þ 2009ǯ 12·î 22Æü (²ÐÍËÆü)   12»þ50ʬ (GMT+09:00)
¾ì½ê 1¹æ´Û303¶µ¼¼
¾ÜºÙ ¡ÚÊó¹ð¼Ô¡Û¡§ÈøºêÆØ»Ê (Áá°ðÅÄÂç³ØÀ¯¼£³Ø¸¦µæ²Ê)

¡Ú¥¿¥¤¥È¥ë¡Û¡§Information Environment and Voters¡Ç Sense of Responsibility

¡Ú¾ì½ê¡Û¡§1¹æ´Û303¶µ¼¼

¡Ú³µÍסۡ§This research examines under what circumstance citizens can believethey voted on their will in elections. In a democracy with free elections, citizens are expected to share responsibility for outcomes of decision-making by a government. One of the reasons why a democracy makes citizens attribute public policy outcomes to themselves is that they believe to have voted on their free will in
elections.

What characteristics of institutions induce such citizens' belief? We argue that information environment matters using a laboratory experiment with a Japanese college student sample. More specifically, higher degree of freedom of choice in terms of type of information received, and duration for which information is available in elections
is the key to higher responsibility for voting decision.
In other words, when citizens can see any political information of their own interest for any time length in decision-making, they will be more likely to believe they made a decision on their free will.
¥«¥Æ¥´¥ê¡¼ À¯¼£·ÐºÑ³Ø´ðÁÃ¥»¥ß¥Ê¡¼¡¦¥é¥ó¥Á¥¿¥¤¥à¥»¥ß¥Ê¡¼
¥µ¥¤¥È¥Þ¥Ã¥×
Home¤Ø