À©ÅÙ¹½ÃÛ¤ÎÀ¯¼£·ÐºÑ³Ø¡Ý´üÂԼ¸½¼Ò²ñ¤Ë¸þ¤±¤Æ¡Ý
English
GLOPEII¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ News ¥¤¥Ù¥ó¥È¥¹¥±¥¸¥å¡¼¥ë ¥ï¡¼¥­¥ó¥°¥Ú¡¼¥Ñ¡¼ GLOPE II À¤ÏÀÄ´ºº°ìÍ÷ ¥ê¥ó¥¯

ͽÄêɽ -¾ÜºÙ¾ðÊó-

·ï̾ WS Luigi Curini»á
³«»ÏÆü»þ 2009ǯ 12·î 18Æü (¶âÍËÆü)   10»þ40ʬ (GMT+09:00)
½ªÎ»Æü»þ 2009ǯ 12·î 18Æü (¶âÍËÆü)   12»þ10ʬ (GMT+09:00)
¾ì½ê 1¹æ´Û409¶µ¼¼
¾ÜºÙ ¡ÚÊó¹ð¼Ô¡Û: Luigi Curini»á (¥ß¥é¥ÎÂç³Ø À¯¼£³ØÉô½Ú¶µ¼ø)
¡ÚÂêÌÜ¡Û: Government Survival the Italian Way: the Core and the Advantages of Policy Immobilism during the First Republic.
¡Ú¾ì½ê¡Û:1¹æ´Û409¶µ¼¼
¡ÚÍ׻ݡÛ
During its almost fifty years of history, the First Italian Republic has been characterised by the highest rate of cabinet turnover in Western Europe. There are several convincing explanations of this exceptional feature. However, by merely looking at the average figure, we overlook the variety in the Italian government experience that is far from being negligible. Focusing on the spatial determinants of the Italian cabinet duration, we show that the presence of a core party plays a positive albeit conditional impact on government duration, largely depending on the degree of intra-cabinet conflict among cabinet members. Moreover, whenever the core is absent, the inability of government to change the status quo appears to foster its duration, rather than the contrary. We argue that this latter outcome appears in line with what has been noted regarding the substantial policy immobilism of the Italian governments for large part of the post-war period. Our results show the importance played by intensive case studies to better analyse some puzzles within cabinet duration literature that otherwise would risk to be averaged out in comparative analysis.
¥«¥Æ¥´¥ê¡¼ ¥ï¡¼¥¯¥·¥ç¥Ã¥×¡¦¥»¥ß¥Ê¡¼
¥µ¥¤¥È¥Þ¥Ã¥×
Home¤Ø