À©ÅÙ¹½ÃÛ¤ÎÀ¯¼£·ÐºÑ³Ø¡Ý´üÂԼ¸½¼Ò²ñ¤Ë¸þ¤±¤Æ¡Ý
English
GLOPEII¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ News ¥¤¥Ù¥ó¥È¥¹¥±¥¸¥å¡¼¥ë ¥ï¡¼¥­¥ó¥°¥Ú¡¼¥Ñ¡¼ GLOPE II À¤ÏÀÄ´ºº°ìÍ÷ ¥ê¥ó¥¯

ͽÄêɽ -¾ÜºÙ¾ðÊó-

·ï̾ WS ¾®À¾½¨¼ù»á
³«»ÏÆü»þ 2010ǯ 1·î 29Æü (¶âÍËÆü)   16»þ20ʬ (GMT+09:00)
½ªÎ»Æü»þ 2010ǯ 1·î 29Æü (¶âÍËÆü)   18»þ00ʬ (GMT+09:00)
¾ì½ê 1¹æ´Û2³¬¡¡²ñµÄ¼¼
¾ÜºÙ ¡ÚÊó¹ð¼Ô¡Û
¡¡¾®À¾½¨¼ù»á¡ÊÁá°ðÅÄÂç³Ø¡¡À¯¼£·ÐºÑ³Ø½Ñ±¡¡¡¶µ¼ø¡Ë
¡Ú¥¿¥¤¥È¥ë¡Û
¡ÖÁýÀǤʤ­ºâÀ¯ºÆ·ú¡×¤ÎÀ¯¼£·ÐºÑ³Ø¡¢
"A Politico-Economic Analysis of "fiscal adjustment without tax increases""
¡Ú¾ì½ê¡Û
1¹æ´Û2³¬ ²ñµÄ¼¼

¡Ú³µÍסÛ
¡¡This paper shows that the composition of fiscal adjustments, spending cuts versus tax increases, serves as a signal of the government's degree of collusion with special interests. The politico-economic model of fiscal policies, combining retrospective voting with common-agency type lobbying, presents undominated separating equilibria and intuitive pooling ones, in both of which fiscal adjustments with sufficiently large spending cuts lead to incumbent reappointment whereas those with only tax increases lead to incumbent defeat. These findings are consistent with the recent empirical evidence of voters behaving as fiscal conservatives. The efficiency-enhancing aspects of the signaling mechanism and the effects of imposing a deficit limit are also analyzed.
¥«¥Æ¥´¥ê¡¼ ¥ï¡¼¥¯¥·¥ç¥Ã¥×¡¦¥»¥ß¥Ê¡¼
¥µ¥¤¥È¥Þ¥Ã¥×
Home¤Ø